December
22, 2000 (updated
1/17/01)
OMNIBUS
SPENDING PACKAGE
INCLUDES MEDICARE
"GIVEBACK" BILL
Overview
On
December 15, 2000,
Congress passed H.R.
4577, an omnibus package
containing four annual
appropriations bills,
including the Labor/Health
and Human Services/Education
bill, and an agreement
for Medicare "givebacks"
to further restore
cuts in Medicare funding
that were made in the
1997 Balanced Budget
Act. The total bill
is about $384 billion.
The
Department of Health
and Human Service will
receive about $260
billion for FY2001.
Included in this funding
is $270 million for
the Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality
(AHRQ), of which about
$50 million would go
toward patient safety
initiatives. Aside
from this AHRQ funding
there are no additional
provisions in the bill
regarding patient safety/medical
errors.
The
Medicare portion of
the bill is the "Medicare,
Medicaid and SCHIP
Benefits Improvement
and Protection Act
of 2000" (BIPA 2000).
BIPA 2000 totals about
$35 billion over five
years. An approximate
breakdown of the increased
reimbursements is as
follows: Hospitals
- $14 billion M+C plans
- $11 billion Direct
benefits for beneficiaries
- $7 billion Home health
agencies - $1.7 billion
Nursing homes - $1.6
billion
Highlights
of BIPA 2000 of Interest
to the QIO Community
Medicare
Appeals: This provision
establishes the new
beneficiary right to
a reconsideration of
initial determinations
made by fiscal intermediaries,
carriers, and PROs.
PROs will continue
to provide initial
determinations (case
review), but their
decisions could be
subject to an independent
review by qualified
independent contractors
(QICs). The Secretary
is directed to contract
with 12 qualified independent
contractors (QIC) for
a period of 3 years.
Any entity making initial
determinations is prohibited
from becoming qualified
independent contractors,
including fiscal intermediaries,
carriers, and PROs.
In
addition to these changes,
the legislation contains
provisions related
to appeals of hospital
issued notices of non-coverage
(HINNs) which could
either be interpreted
to preserve this PRO
responsibility or give
it to the QICs. AHQA
is working under the
worst-case assumption
that the PROs no longer
perform HINN reviews,
but is still trying
to clarify the legislative
intent. It is also
unclear whether PROs
maintain their ability
to perform reconsiderations/redeterminations
of their own initial
determinations. Current
law gives PROs the
responsibility to perform
"reconsiderations,"
but this new statute
does not specifically
maintain this role
for PROs. It does clearly
state that fiscal intermediaries
and carriers are able
to do their own redeterminations.
This appears to be
a technical oversight
and not a policy change.
In
addition to issuing
regulations specifying
all aspects of the
appeals process, the
Secretary is directed
to perform outreach
activities to inform
beneficiaries, providers,
and suppliers of their
appeal rights and procedures.
It is not clear how
this outreach activity
will occur.
AHQA
believes the QIC process
is duplicative and
unnecessary and finds
no basis for creating
a new entity to perform
HINNs. AHQA will seek
regulatory and/or legislative
solutions to these
issues before the effective
date of October 2002.
M+C
Reimbursement:
Increased
Payments: The bill
increases the minimum
payment amount to $525
per member per month
in 2001 in metropolitan
statistical areas of
more than 250,000,
and $475 per member
per month for all other
areas, effective March
1, 2001. It also gives
the plans a three percent
increase 2001 and returns
to the current law
minimum update of two
percent thereafter.
Phase-in
of Risk Adjuster:
Risk adjustment, designed
to more fairly compensate
physicians for the
actual costs of caring
for different patients,
will be implemented
gradually through 2007
rather than 2004. The
provision specifically
requires the full implementation
of risk-adjusted payments
for individuals with
congestive heart failure.
Opportunity
to Reconsider 2001
Pullouts: M+C plans
canceling their contracts
or reducing the service
areas for 2001 would
be able to reconsider
their decision based
on revised M+C capitation
rates that will be
published by the Secretary
of HHS within two weeks
after enactment.
New
Fine for Pullouts:
A $100,000 fine will
be levied against managed-care
companies that leave
a region without the
governmentÕs permission
before their annual
contract expires.
Modernization
of Screening Mammography
Benefit: The bill
establishes two new
payment rates are established
that utilize advanced
new technology for
the period April 1,
2001 to December 31,
2001: 1) Payment for
technologies that directly
take digital images
would equal 150% of
what would otherwise
be paid for a bilateral
diagnostic mammography,
2) For technologies
that convert standard
film images to digital
form, an additional
payment of fifteen
dollars would be authorized.
The Secretary will
determine whether a
new code is required
for tests furnished
after 2001.
Exemption
of Critical Access
Hospital Swing Beds
from SNF PPS: Swing
beds in critical access
hospitals (CAHs) would
be exempt from the
SNF prospective payment
system. CAHs would
be paid for covered
SNF services on a reasonable
cost basis.
EMTALA
Study: The bill
requests GAO to evaluate
the impact of the Emergency
Medical Treatment and
Active Labor Act on
hospitals, emergency
physicians, and physicians
on-call to emergency
departments. GAO would
have to submit this
report to Congress
by May 1, 2001.
GAO
Studies and Reports
on Medicare Payments:
The provision would
require the Comptroller
General to conduct
a study on the post-payment
audit process for physicians'
services. The study
would include the proper
level of resources
HCFA should devote
to educating physicians
regarding coding and
billing, documentation
requirements, and calculation
of overpayments. The
Comptroller General
would also be required
to conduct a study
of the aggregate effects
of regulatory, audit,
oversight and paperwork
burdens on physicians
and other health care
providers participating
in Medicare.
GAO
Study on Certain Eligibility
Requirements For Critical
Access Hospitals:
Within one year of
enactment, GAO would
be required to conduct
a study on the eligibility
requirements for critical
access hospitals (CAHs)
with respect to limitations
on average length of
stay and number of
beds, including an
analysis of the feasibility
of having a distinct
part unit as part of
a CAH and the effect
of seasonal variations
in CAH eligibility
requirements.
|