American Health Quality Association Photo Collage
American Health Quality Association Email:   Password: Login  
AHQA Additional Topics
AHQA Additional Topics
Search:  
More links in this section
Quality Update for November 2, 2007

Quality Update for October 5, 2007

Quality Update for September 21, 2007

Quality Update for September 7, 2007

Quality Update for August 24, 2007

Quality Update for July 27, 2007

Quality Update for June 29, 2007

Quality Update for June 1, 2007

Quality Update for May 18, 2007

Quality Update for May 4, 2007

Quality Update for April 20, 2007

Quality Update for April 6, 2007

Quality Update for March 8, 2007

Quality Update for February 22, 2007

Quality Update for February 1, 2007

Quality Update for January 18, 2007

Quality Update for December 14, 2006

Quality Update for November 30, 2006

Quality Update for October 26, 2006

Quality Update for October 12, 2006

Quality Update for September 27, 2006

Quality Update for September 14, 2006

Quality Update for August 31, 2006

Quality Update for August 10, 2006

Quality Update for July 27, 2006

Quality Update for July 13, 2006

Quality Update for June 22, 2006

Quality Update for June 8, 2006

Quality Update for May 25, 2006

Quality Update for May 11, 2006

Quality Update for April 27, 2006

Quality Update for April 13, 2006

Quality Update for March 31, 2006

Quality Update for March 16, 2006

Quality Update for March 2, 2006

Quality Update for February 16, 2006

Quality Update for February 2, 2006

Quality Update for January 19, 2006

Quality Update for January 05, 2006

Quality Update for December 21, 2005

Quality Update for December 1, 2005

Quality Update for November 10, 2005

Quality Update for October 27, 2005, 2005

Quality Update for October 13, 2005

Quality Update for September 29, 2005

Quality Update for September 15, 2005

Quality Update for September 1, 2005

Quality Update for August 18, 2005

Quality Update for August 4, 2005

Quality Update July 21, 2005

Quality Update for July 7, 2005

Quality Update for June 23, 2005

Quality Update for June 9, 2005

Quality Update for May 25, 2005

Quality Update for May 12, 2005

Quality Update for April 28, 2005

Quality Update for April 15, 2005

Quality Update for March 24, 2005

Quality Update For March 10, 2005

Quality Update For February 25, 2005

Quality Update For February 2, 2005

Quality Update for January 20, 2005

Quality Update for January 7, 2005

Quality Update for December 17, 2004

Quality Update for December 3, 2004

Quality Update for November 19, 2004

Quality Update for November 4, 2004

Quality Update for October 22, 2004

Quality Update for October 08, 2004

Quality Update for September 23, 2004

Quality Update for September 10, 2004

Quality Update for August 20, 2004

Quality Update for July 30, 2004

Quality Update for July 1, 2004

Quality Update for June 18, 2004

Quality Update for June 4, 2004

Quality Update for May 21, 2004

Quality Update for May 10, 2004

Quality Update for April 22, 2004

Quality Update for April 9, 2004

Quality Update for March 25, 2004

Quality Update for March 5, 2004

Quality Update for February 20, 2004

Quality Update for February 5, 2004

Quality Update for January 23, 2004

Quality Update for January 9, 2004

Quality Update for December 12, 2003

Quality Update for November 28, 2003

Quality Update for November 14, 2003

Quality Update for October 31, 2003

Quality Update for October 16, 2003

Quality Update for October 3, 2003

Quality Update for September 23, 2003

Quality Update for September 5, 2003

Quality Update for August 22, 2003

Quality Update for August 8, 2003

Quality Update for July 24, 2003

Quality Update for July 11, 2003

Quality Update for June 27, 2003

Quality Update for June 13, 2003

Quality Update for May 30, 2003

Quality Update for May 16, 2003

Quality Update for May 2, 2003

Quality Update for April 17, 2003

Quality Update for April 4, 2003

Quality Update for March 20, 2003

Quality Update for March 7, 2003

Quality Update for February 21, 2003

Quality Update for January 31, 2003

Quality Update for January 17, 2003

Quality Update for January 3, 2003

AHQA Menu Bar
Quality Update for April 13, 2006


Quality Update for April 13, 2006

Massachusetts Legislates Health Care for All, Creates Quality and Cost Council

AHQA Submits Testimony on HIT to House Subcommittee

AHQF/eHI HIE Report Released to Public

BtE and eHI Form Business Relationship to Share Resources and Advance Quality

CMS Announces Significant Progress in Fistula First

AHRQ Report Shows Small Practices Need Assistance for HIT Adoption

Group Releases Common Framework for HIE

Maryland Develops End-of-Life Guide for Health Care Proxy

Spanish Kidney Disease Materials Available

Massachusetts Legislates Health Care for All, Creates Quality and Cost Council

Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney recently signed into law a bill that will make health insurance available to every state resident by 2009. The new law also includes the creation of a quality and cost council and collection and publication of data, which will allow consumers to compare the quality, track record, and cost of hospitals and providers.

Under the new law, every Massachusetts resident will be required, by July 1, 2007, to purchase health insurance. For uninsured individuals not eligible for Medicaid, those with lower incomes will receive premium assistance on an income-based sliding scale for policies with no deductibles; those with higher incomes will be able to purchase lower-cost policies in the private market. Premium assistance will be financed by redirecting a portion of the $1 billion currently spent by state government on the uninsured.

Beginning on January 1, 2008, failure by individuals to purchase health insurance will result in the loss of their state tax refund equal to 50 percent of an affordable health insurance premium. Penalties will be assessed for each month without creditable coverage.

The creation of an entity, the Commonwealth Care Health Insurance Connector, will allow individuals to purchase affordable plans on a pre-tax basis, will administer premium assistance for low-income individuals, and will facilitate employer contributions for both full-time and part-time workers and those working at more than one company.

Non-working individuals, working individuals at companies that do not offer health insurance, workers not eligible for coverage at their place of business such as part-timers, contractors, and new employees, small businesses with 50 or fewer employees, and those who are self-employed will be able to use the Connector.

In comments delivered at the bill’s signing, Governor Romney said that the bill can lead to: “every citizen with affordable, comprehensive health insurance; small businesses able to conveniently buy insurance for their employees at a cost that’s competitive with big businesses; medical transparency, bringing marketplace dynamics to health care, really for the first time; and finally beginning to rein in health inflation.”

Back to top

Quality and Cost Council
The legislation also calls for the creation of a health care quality and cost council to establish health care quality improvement and cost containment goals designed to promote high-quality, safe, effective, timely, efficient, equitable and patient-centered health care. Under the law, the governor must appoint a QIO representative to serve on the health care quality and cost council.

“We at MassPRO applaud the work of the legislature to provide access and insurance to some of the most vulnerable citizens in our Commonwealth. Specifically, we are very excited to play a lead role in working with the executive office of health and human services to promote high quality health care through the implementation of the quality and cost council,” said Jane McCarthy MS, RN, Senior Director, External Relations at MassPRO.

“Both the coverage enhancements and little noticed quality improvement provisions of this legislation should serve as a model to QIOs and their allies in improving the quality of care through state initiatives,” said AHQA Executive Vice President, David Schulke.

Read the new law at: http://www.mass.gov/legis/laws/seslaw06/sl060058.htm

In addition to improving access to health care financing, the legislation contains several provisions designed to improve health care quality, including:

  • Providing one million dollars for work through the state’s “division of health care quality [to] develop a proactive statewide infection prevention and control program in licensed health care facilities following protocols of the Centers for Disease Control for the purposes of implementation and adherence to infection control practices that are the keys to preventing the transmission of infectious diseases.”
  • Creation of “a health care quality and cost council within, but not subject to control of, the executive office of health and human services. The council shall establish health care quality improvement and cost containment goals. The goals shall be designed to promote high-quality, safe, effective, timely, efficient, equitable and patient-centered health care…. The council shall consist of the secretary of health and human services, the auditor of the commonwealth or his designee, the inspector general or his designee, the attorney general or his designee, the commissioner of insurance, the executive director of the group insurance commission, and 7 persons to be appointed by the governor, 1 of whom shall be a representative of a health care quality improvement organization recognized by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services, 1 of whom shall be a representative of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Inc. recommended by the organization’s board of directors…. The representatives of nongovernmental organizations shall serve staggered 3-year terms. The council shall be chaired by the secretary of health and human services.”
  • Create a state quality improvement program that may “contract with an independent health care organization to provide the council with technical assistance related to its duties including, but not limited to, the development of health care quality goals, cost containment goals, performance measurement benchmarks, the design and implementation of health quality interventions, the construction of a consumer health information website and the preparation of reports, including any reports as required by this section. The independent health care organization shall have a history of demonstrating the skill and expertise necessary to: (i) collect, analyze and aggregate data related to costs and quality across the health care continuum; (ii) identify, through data analysis quality improvement areas; (iii) work with Medicare, MassHealth, other payers’ data and clinical performance measures; (iv) collaborate in the design and implementation of quality improvement measures; (v) establish and maintain security measures necessary to maintain confidentiality and preserve the integrity of the data; (vi) design and implement health care quality improvement interventions with health care service providers; and (vii) identify and, when necessary, develop appropriate measures of cost and quality for inclusion in the website. To the extent possible, the independent organization shall collaborate with other organizations that develop, collect and publicly report health care cost and quality measures.”
  • Providing for annually updated quality measures, stating “[a]ny independent organization under contract with the council shall develop and update on an annual basis a reporting plan specifying the cost and quality measures to be included on the internet site. The reporting plan shall be consistent with the requirements of subsections (a) and (b). The organization shall give consideration to those measures that are already available in the public domain and to whether it is cost effective for the council to license commercially available comparative data and consumer decision support tools.”
  • Provide public quality information, saying “[t]he council shall establish and maintain a consumer health information website. The website shall contain information comparing the cost and quality of health care services and may also contain general information related to health care as the council determines to be appropriate. The website shall be designed to assist consumers in making informed decisions regarding the medical care and informed choices between health care providers. Information shall be presented in a format that is understandable to the average consumer. The council shall take appropriate action to publicize the availability of its website and make available written documentation available upon request and as necessary.”
  • A payment incentive provision that says, “Hospital rate increases shall be made contingent upon hospital adherence to quality standards and achievement of performance benchmarks, including the reduction of racial and ethnic disparities in the provision of health care. Such benchmarks shall be developed or adopted by the executive office of health and human services so as to advance a common national framework for quality measurement and reporting, drawing on measures that are approved by the National Quality Forum and adopted by the Hospitals Quality Alliance and other national groups concerned with quality, in addition to the Boston Public Health Commission Disparities Project Hospital Working Group Report Guidelines.”

Back to top

AHQA Submits Testimony on HIT to House Subcommittee

In testimony submitted to the House Committee on Ways and Means, Subcommittee on Health, AHQA Executive Vice President David Schulke told lawmakers that QIO assistance in helping providers adopt health information technology (HIT) is “already proving to be highly valued by physicians in the field,” noting that in just eight months, nearly 3,000 practices have signed up for assistance from their local QIO.

Schulke told Members of Congress that QIOs will ultimately work with a total of 4,000 primary care practices during the 8th Scope of Work and four out of five will be small to medium sized practices, which are most likely to need QIO assistance with HIT adoption.

The models for QIO assistance with HIT adoption were developed through the four-state DOQ-IT project completed by QIOs in California (Lumetra), Utah (HealthInsight), Arkansas (Arkansas Foundation for Medical Care), and Massachusetts (MassPRO), just prior to implementation of the 8th Scope of Work. All QIOs across the country are now using these models to help providers under their 8th Scope of Work contract, Schulke said.

In addition to developing these valuable tools, the DOQ-IT pilot showed that “Physicians need help from independent organizations that can be there for them throughout the process of adoption, implementation and effective use of HIT. They need support from systems change experts who can help ensure that care processes are redesigned to reflect best practices,” Schulke testified.

“Literature and experience” he continued, show that “as many as half of all EHR implementations fail for one reason or another, often because practices did not go through the rigorous preparation and development necessary for success.” Having QIO assistance, Schulke told lawmakers, helps providers overcome these barriers and successfully use EHRs to improve patient care and prepare for upcoming pay-for-performance P4P initiatives. “Using HIT to report data, measure quality, and undertake improvement will give participating physicians a major leg up” on P4P said Schulke.

Read the testimony at: http://www.ahqa.org/pub/uploads/AHQA_Testimony_HIT_WM_
Schulke_4_6_06_FINAL.pdf

Back to top

AHQF/eHI HIE Report Released to Public

AHQA recently released the final report, Quality Improvement Organizations and Health Information Exchange, to the public. Prepared by the American Health Quality Foundation, AHQA’s educational arm, with assistance from the eHealth Initiative, the report was given to congressional staff in March.

Report authors found that QIOs are accelerating the formation of health information exchange (HIE) nationwide. More than 40 QIOs are currently supporting local, regional, and statewide initiatives to develop health information exchange (HIE) networks. QIOs are also convening stakeholders and helping communities reach consensus on the goals, operation, and funding of HIE initiatives. QIOs bring a “quality improvement focus to the building of an HIE” in addition to the important role as a neutral convener, said Deirdre Gifford, MD, MPH, Director, Outpatient Quality Improvement at Quality Partners of Rhode Island at the March briefing for congressional staff.

“The benefits of establishing viable HIE are obvious,” said Christine Bechtel, AHQA Director of Government Affairs, “But how to do it is not. Communities face enormous challenges securing upfront funding, creating a sustainable business model, and helping health providers adopt HIT to connect with each other. QIOs are in the forefront of helping their communities make progress in these areas.”

Other findings from the report include:

  • 42 QIOs are participating in engaging diverse stakeholders across care settings.
  • 37 QIOs are working with stakeholders to build consensus on priorities, roles, and functions of HIT and HIE.
  • 22 QIOs are actively involved in governance.
  • 10 QIOs are working to develop a sustainable business plan.
  • 10 QIOs are helping to develop information sharing policies.
  • 10 QIOs are participating in technical design.
  • All QIOs are engaged in clinical process change and HIT adoption through their work with DOQ-IT in the 8th Scope of Work.

Results of a recent eHealth Initiative (eHI) survey of more than 100 state, regional, and community-based initiatives showed that HIE development is on the rise nationwide. “Given the similar interests, goals and objectives of QIO and HIE initiatives,” authors of the AHQF-eHI report noted, “we expect QIOs to work even more closely with these initiatives in the future, expanding their roles over time.”

The report is available online at www.ahqa.org.

Back to top

RHIO Wiki
The Center for Health Transformation, eHealth Initiative, and the College of Health Care Information Management Executives have partnered to create a website called RHIO Wiki, an online resource where community leaders working on RHIOs and HIE can learn about other efforts, experiences, and best practices from initiatives across the country. The RHIO Wiki is an open, online, real-time tool that provides a library of information on other local and regional efforts and a forum to exchange thoughts and experiences on specific challenges, issues, and opportunities. Visit RHIO Wiki at: http://www.rhiowiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=Home_Page

Back to top

BtE and eHI Form Business Relationship to Share Resources and Advance Quality

Bridges to Excellence (BtE) and the eHealth Initiative (eHI) recently announced a new business agreement that will allow each to maintain separate legal identities and boards of directors but share management support to enhance administrative efficiency. The new business relationship is expected to enable each organization to leverage a broader set of tools and resources to promote quality improvement. eHI will inform and educate the states, regions, and communities with which it works of the role that BtE plays to improve quality of care and BtE will become part of eHI’s portfolio of tools.

For the most part, the members, partners, and customers of both eHI and BtE will see few changes in their interactions with each organization. The mission, goals, objectives, and plans of each organization will remain intact. BtE will continue to be run by co-founder Francois de Brantes, who has stepped down from leading health initiatives at General Electric; eHI will continue to be led by its current CEO, Janet Marchibroda.

“This relationship makes sense because both organizations are working to transform health care throughout the United States,” says John Glaser, president of eHI and chief information officer for Partners HealthCare System in Boston. “eHI is driving transformation by engaging multiple stakeholders at the state and local levels to mobilize health information electronically. BtE is driving transformation by engaging healthcare purchasers and health plans to develop and deploy rewards to physicians for higher quality healthcare and wider use of information technology,” he says.

Under a model developed by MassPRO, practices participating in DOQ-IT can be eligible for BtE financial rewards if BtE is active in the state. AHQA is working with several QIOs and the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association to expand BtE activity to more states and, with MassPRO and BtE is working to develop tools to help QIOs in this process.

Back to top

CMS Announces Significant Progress in Fistula First

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) recently reported significant progress in improving care for patients with kidney disease, exceeding the Nation’s Healthy People 2010 goal for vascular access for kidney disease 5 years ahead of schedule. The fistula adoption rate has increased to 41 percent from a baseline of 33 percent in 2003. The coalition’s goal is a 66 percent fistula adoption rate by 2009.

Fistula First is a “National Vascular Access Improvement Initiative” that aims to provide safer, higher-quality access to hemodialysis for patients who suffer from End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD). Patients who receive dialysis with an access method other than a fistula have a 20 to 70 percent greater chance of death in the first year after their placement. In addition, fistulas cost less to place and maintain than other forms of access and are associated with less rework and complications requiring hospitalization.

“The Fistula First initiative is an excellent example of how real improvements can be made in our health care system by working with providers to change processes, impart knowledge and increase education on state of the art techniques,” said Barry Straube, MD, who serves as acting CMS Chief Medical Officer and is a nephrologist.

This progress noted so far, CMS said in a press release, is largely due to the work of the national Fistula First Breakthrough Coalition, a group of kidney disease stakeholders that is working to improve and extend lives for thousands of people living with chronic kidney disease. Qualis Health, the QIO for Washington and Idaho, and Louisiana Health Care Review, the ESRD Networks, and CMS are among others listed as coalition members on the Fistula First website.

For more information on Fistula First: www.fistulafirst.org

Back to top

AHRQ Report Shows Small Practices Need Assistance for HIT Adoption

In a report, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) found that while health information technology (HIT) has been shown to improve quality of care for patients, most health care providers need more information about how to implement these technologies successfully. The report, “Costs and Benefits of Health Information Technology,” is a synthesis of recent HIT studies prepared by the Southern California Evidence-based Practice Center-RAND Corporation, one of 13 evidence-based practice centers supported by AHRQ.

The authors conclude that scientific reviews have shown significant improvements in the quality of health care utilizing HIT systems. However, these successes have occurred primarily within large health care systems that devoted substantial resources to HIT adoption. “More widespread implementation of HIT is limited by the lack of generalizable knowledge about what types of HIT and methods for its implementation will prove most useful for specific health organizations, especially for small practices and small hospitals,” the report said.

“Smaller practices and hospitals need to know how these improvements can be achieved in settings like theirs, using the kinds of commercial systems they are likely to employ. AHRQ’s health IT initiative is designed to generate and share the kind of information providers need,” said AHRQ Director Carolyn M. Clancy, MD. AHRQ’s HIT initiative provides grant funds for more than 100 projects across the country where HIT systems are being implemented. Findings from these projects will be available through the AHRQ National Resource Center for Health Information Technology, at http://www.healthit.ahrq.gov.

The report also offered recommendations for future research, including:

  • Developing consistent standards for reporting HIT implementation studies
  • Describe and measure the organizational change and workflow redesign required by and accompanying HIT implementation (or a new HIT function) with “greater validity, reliability, and precision.”
  • More and better designed research trials to: determine costs and benefits of HIT implementation, its efficacy and effectiveness across settings, which components are most useful, and evaluate its effects on quality. More robust research would also, the study said, “enhance the clinical relevance of results” of HIT studies.

QIOs, through the 8th Scope of Work, are working with at least five percent of adult primary care practice sites in every state to help them adopt and use HIT effectively -- most of them small to medium sized.

The report is available at http://www.ahrq.gov/downloads/pub/evidence/pdf/hitsyscosts/hitsys.pdf
An interactive database providing access to the studies reviewed as part of the report will be available at http://healthit.ahrq.gov/tools/rand. An article summarizing the report is available in the May 16 edition of Annals of Internal Medicine, available now at: http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/full/0000605-200605160-00125v1.

Back to top

Group Releases Common Framework for HIE

Connecting for Health, a public-private collaborative of more than 100 organizations, recently released its Common Framework: Resources for Implementing Private and Secure Health Information Exchange. The Common Framework provides 16 initial elements of a comprehensive approach for secure, authorized, and private health information sharing, so that patients and their authorized providers can have access to vital clinical data when and where they need it.

The Common Framework includes technical and policy components developed by experts in information technology, health privacy law, and policy. The policy components determine how information is protected; the technical components determine how information is exchanged. “We believe it was critical that these technology and policy resources be designed in tandem. Together, they protect patient privacy while enabling the authorized exchange of medical records,” said Carol Diamond, MD, MPH, managing director of the Markle Foundation. Together, they include:

  • The architecture for privacy in a networked health information environment
  • Model privacy policies and procedures in health information exchange
  • Notification and consent when using a record locator service
  • Correctly matching patients with their records
  • Authentication of system users
  • Patients’ access to their own health information
  • Auditing access to and use of health information exchange
  • Breaches of confidential health information
  • Technical issues and requirements for implementation
  • Health information exchange: architecture implementation guide
  • Medication history standards
  • Laboratory results standards
  • Background issues on data quality
  • Record locator service: technical background from the Massachusetts prototype community
  • Key topics in a model contract for health information exchange
  • A model contract for health information exchange

One of the key functions of the Common Framework is to enable a diverse group of existing and developing networks to have a common way to share health information – the basis of health information exchange initiatives. “The policy components of the Common Framework can save time and effort on the part of many organizations and networks working on health information exchange,” said John Halamka, MD, CEO of MA-SHARE and emergency physician, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Mass.

“We know from a recent report that 42 QIOs are significantly involved in local HIE initiatives, many in leadership roles. For those QIOs, the Common Framework should save time and resources by providing both technical architecture and model policies and procedures,” said Christine Bechtel, AHQA Director of Government Affairs. AHQA EVP David Schulke serves on the Connecting for Health Steering Committee, where Bechtel serves as AHQA’s primary representative.

In addition to AHQA, the Connecting for Health initiative includes more than 100 collaborators, such as: the Markle Foundation, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, American College of Physicians, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Leapfrog Group, and Blue Cross Blue Shield.

The Common Framework is available for free at: http://www.connectingforhealth.org/commonframework/index.html

Back to top

Maryland Develops End-of-Life Guide for Health Care Proxy

Maryland recently became the first state to release an end-of-life guide and handbook designed to educate family members or friends about serving as a health care proxy. Created in collaboration with the American Bar Association, “Making Medical Decisions for Someone Else: A Guide for Marylanders,” could serve as a national model in addressing end-of-life medical issues.

Maryland Attorney General J. Joseph Curran Jr. is considered a national leader in end-of-life care policy. Curran has encouraged Maryland citizens to use advanced directives, plans that enable people to let their preferences for medical care known in the event they cannot speak for themselves. The new guide and handbook goes a step farther by giving family members and friends designated to serve as health care proxy key information on how to fulfill that role, which allows them to make medical decisions for someone else. These resources will be particularly helpful in situations where no advanced directive exists – as was the case with Florida resident Terri Schiavo.

The new resources were funded by the Morton K. and Jane Blaustein Foundation. The guide “Making Medical Decisions for Someone Else: A Guide for Marylanders” is available at: http://www.oag.state.md.us/Healthpol/proxyGuide.htm. The handbook, “Making Medical Decisions for Someone Else: A Maryland Handbook” is available at: http://www.oag.state.md.us/Healthpol/proxyHandbook.pdf.

Back to top

Spanish Kidney Disease Materials Available

The National Kidney Disease Education Program (NKDEP) recently developed a Spanish-language brochure and website (www.nkdep.nih.gov/espanol) with consumer information on kidney disease.

Developed in collaboration with medical experts and Hispanic community organizations, the resources provide science-based information on the risk factors for kidney disease, the basic principles of kidney function, and the importance of early testing. The materials also stress the availability of medications that can prevent or slow the progression of kidney disease.

Print resources can be viewed on the NKDEP site (http://www.nkdep.nih.gov/resources/index.htm#spanish). To order brochures, contact Christen Horn at christen.horn@ogilvypr.com.

Back to top

Copyright © 2003, American Health Quality Association. All Rights Reserved.