American Health Quality Association Photo Collage
American Health Quality Association Email:   Password: Login  
AHQA Additional Topics
AHQA Additional Topics
Search:  
More links in this section
Quality Update for November 2, 2007

Quality Update for October 5, 2007

Quality Update for September 21, 2007

Quality Update for September 7, 2007

Quality Update for August 24, 2007

Quality Update for July 27, 2007

Quality Update for June 29, 2007

Quality Update for June 1, 2007

Quality Update for May 18, 2007

Quality Update for May 4, 2007

Quality Update for April 20, 2007

Quality Update for April 6, 2007

Quality Update for March 8, 2007

Quality Update for February 22, 2007

Quality Update for February 1, 2007

Quality Update for January 18, 2007

Quality Update for December 14, 2006

Quality Update for November 30, 2006

Quality Update for October 26, 2006

Quality Update for October 12, 2006

Quality Update for September 27, 2006

Quality Update for September 14, 2006

Quality Update for August 31, 2006

Quality Update for August 10, 2006

Quality Update for July 27, 2006

Quality Update for July 13, 2006

Quality Update for June 22, 2006

Quality Update for June 8, 2006

Quality Update for May 25, 2006

Quality Update for May 11, 2006

Quality Update for April 27, 2006

Quality Update for April 13, 2006

Quality Update for March 31, 2006

Quality Update for March 16, 2006

Quality Update for March 2, 2006

Quality Update for February 16, 2006

Quality Update for February 2, 2006

Quality Update for January 19, 2006

Quality Update for January 05, 2006

Quality Update for December 21, 2005

Quality Update for December 1, 2005

Quality Update for November 10, 2005

Quality Update for October 27, 2005, 2005

Quality Update for October 13, 2005

Quality Update for September 29, 2005

Quality Update for September 15, 2005

Quality Update for September 1, 2005

Quality Update for August 18, 2005

Quality Update for August 4, 2005

Quality Update July 21, 2005

Quality Update for July 7, 2005

Quality Update for June 23, 2005

Quality Update for June 9, 2005

Quality Update for May 25, 2005

Quality Update for May 12, 2005

Quality Update for April 28, 2005

Quality Update for April 15, 2005

Quality Update for March 24, 2005

Quality Update For March 10, 2005

Quality Update For February 25, 2005

Quality Update For February 2, 2005

Quality Update for January 20, 2005

Quality Update for January 7, 2005

Quality Update for December 17, 2004

Quality Update for December 3, 2004

Quality Update for November 19, 2004

Quality Update for November 4, 2004

Quality Update for October 22, 2004

Quality Update for October 08, 2004

Quality Update for September 23, 2004

Quality Update for September 10, 2004

Quality Update for August 20, 2004

Quality Update for July 30, 2004

Quality Update for July 1, 2004

Quality Update for June 18, 2004

Quality Update for June 4, 2004

Quality Update for May 21, 2004

Quality Update for May 10, 2004

Quality Update for April 22, 2004

Quality Update for April 9, 2004

Quality Update for March 25, 2004

Quality Update for March 5, 2004

Quality Update for February 20, 2004

Quality Update for February 5, 2004

Quality Update for January 23, 2004

Quality Update for January 9, 2004

Quality Update for December 12, 2003

Quality Update for November 28, 2003

Quality Update for November 14, 2003

Quality Update for October 31, 2003

Quality Update for October 16, 2003

Quality Update for October 3, 2003

Quality Update for September 23, 2003

Quality Update for September 5, 2003

Quality Update for August 22, 2003

Quality Update for August 8, 2003

Quality Update for July 24, 2003

Quality Update for July 11, 2003

Quality Update for June 27, 2003

Quality Update for June 13, 2003

Quality Update for May 30, 2003

Quality Update for May 16, 2003

Quality Update for May 2, 2003

Quality Update for April 17, 2003

Quality Update for April 4, 2003

Quality Update for March 20, 2003

Quality Update for March 7, 2003

Quality Update for February 21, 2003

Quality Update for January 31, 2003

Quality Update for January 17, 2003

Quality Update for January 3, 2003

AHQA Menu Bar
Quality Update for February 16, 2006


Quality Update for February 16, 2006

Six QIOs Form Multi-State SCIP Collaborative

AHRQ Launches New ‘Learning Resources' To Help Providers Adopt Health IT

Medicare Health Support Programs Enroll More than 100,000 Chronically Ill Beneficiaries

Study of PACE Program Shows Home Care Effective

HIMSS Conference: Brailer Plans to Assess RHIOs; Leadership Survey Results

SureScripts to Give MDs, Patients Access to Medication Histories

Near Perfect Flu Shot Rate Comes with Price

Call for Nominations:  2006 John M. Eisenberg Award

Costlier Heart Care May Indicate Inefficient Use of Technology, Study Says

Study: Key Elements to Effective Use of Patient Survey Data Identified

Six QIOs Form Multi-State SCIP Collaborative

QIOs in Michigan, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Ohio, and Wisconsin have formed an independent collaborative to collectively address the 8 th Scope of Work goal of reducing surgical complications by 25% in identified participant group (IPG) hospitals in every state. The collaborative, a spin-off of the national SCIP effort, is called SCIP6. It is designed to provide a platform to share best practices, convey experiences, and increase spread beyond individual state borders.

The QIOs involved in SCIP6 are: Illinois Foundation for Quality Health Care, Health Care Excel (IN and KY) MPRO, Ohio KePro, and MetaStar. Together they will share resources and expenses for conference calls, speakers, events, and interventions.

Through SCIP6 they will conduct virtual meetings and a monthly conference call, providing IPG hospitals in all six states the opportunity to network and learn from each other as well as from experts in the field of surgical care. The hospitals will also share quarterly, aggregate data for each of the SCIP quality of care measures across all six states.

To support peer-to-peer interaction, the collaborative has set up a secured internet forum where SCIP6 participants can ask questions and gain insight from the experiences of their peers, whether in the same town or another state. “SCIP6 allows providers in Ohio to know what providers in Michigan are doing in similar situations,” said Sylvia Carson, Senior Marketing/Communications Specialist, Illinois Foundation for Quality Healthcare.

The collaborative will also provide a sustainability model so providers can learn how to work individually to maintain achievements. In addition, SCIP6 plans to evaluate the effectiveness of this innovative approach, “Evaluation is going to be very key part of this project. We like to see this as a model that other states can benefit from,” said Carson.

The kickoff of SCIP6 is scheduled to take place on February 16, 2006 as a virtual meeting. David Hunt, MD, FACS, medical officer in CMS' Quality Improvement Group, OCSQ, will deliver the keynote address. Dr. Hunt is the Government Task Leader for the Medicare Patient Safety Monitoring System as well as the national SCIP program.

Contact information for the QIOs involved in SCIP6:

  • Illinois — Illinois Foundation for Quality Health Care: Sylvia Carson, (630) 928-5869
  • Indiana — Health Care Excel: Ellen Murphy, (812) 234-1499 ext. 215
  • Kentucky — Health Care Excel: Duane Spurlock, (502) 454-5112
  • Michigan — MPRO: Beverly Moody, (248) 465-7378
  • Ohio — Ohio KePro: Dan Moss, (216) 447-9604 ext. 2219
  • Wisconsin — MetaStar: Kay Simmons, (608) 274-1940

Back to top

AHRQ Launches New ‘Learning Resources' To Help Providers Adopt Health IT

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) launched a new suite of “learning resources” to help health care providers adopt health information technologies (HIT) quickly and effectively by sharing lessons learned in a timely manner. Part of the National Resource Center for Health Information Technology, the new resources provide information to “help health care providers at the ground level learn from each other's real-world experience and give them easy access to the best information available,” said AHRQ Director Carolyn M. Clancy, MD in a press release. The new resources are at the center's website: http://www.healthit.ahrq.gov.

How it works
AHRQ funds more than 100 HIT projects throughout the nation that provide a clinic-level window on the pitfalls and opportunities that others will face in HIT adoption. In the new resource center, AHRQ synthesizes these experiences to help others successfully adopt HIT. AHRQ also provides evidence for the business case for HIT adoption by measuring benefits from the health IT projects it funds.

Included in the resource center are:

  • Emerging lessons from the field;
  • A knowledge library with links to more than 5,000 health IT information resources;
  • An evaluation toolkit to help those implementing health IT projects;
  • Summary of key topics;
  • Resources pointing to current health IT activities, funding opportunities, and other information.

Moving quickly
“For providers, especially those in smaller practices, adoption of health IT can be challenging on many levels. Adoption of health IT will be too slow if providers have to reinvent the wheel one by one. This shared learning tool brings the lessons of experience together in one place, so we can help providers avoid problems and achieve greater benefits when they make their move to health IT,” said Dr. Clancy.

“This is a learn-as-you-go project,” Dr. Clancy said. “The President and HHS Secretary Mike Leavitt have made health IT adoption an urgent priority. We're not waiting for perfect information. We'll make good information available as we learn it.”

For more information, contact AHRQ Public Affairs: (301) 427-1241 or (301) 427-1855.

Back to top

Medicare Health Support Programs Enroll More than 100,000 Chronically Ill Beneficiaries

More than 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries are now participating in the voluntary Medicare Health Support programs, which are designed to reduce health risks and improve the quality of life for Medicare beneficiaries with chronic conditions, accounting for a disproportionate share of health care expenditures and a leading cause of illness, disability, and death.

The Medicare Health Support program (initially called the Chronic Care Improvement Program) was created as part of the Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003; the pilots were announced in December 2004 and operate in the following areas:

  • Oklahoma (started August 1, 2005)
  • Washington , DC & Maryland (started August 1, 2005)
  • Western Pennsylvania (started August 15, 2005)
  • Mississippi (started August 22, 2005)
  • Northwest Georgia (started September 12, 2005)
  • Illinois (started September 1, 2005)
  • Central Florida (started November 1, 2005)
  • Tennessee (started January 16, 2006)

Using historical claims data, CMS identified beneficiaries in the pilot regions who are candidates for Medicare Health Support.  More than 160,000 beneficiaries with such chronic conditions as congestive heart failure, complex diabetes, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, were invited to participate in these programs; 100,000 are now enrolled.

Beneficiaries with multiple chronic conditions often have heavy self-care burdens and experience poor health outcomes, increased costs, and diminished quality of life, despite the best efforts of health care providers. The Medicare Health Support programs address this problem by connecting participants with specially trained health professionals who help them manage adhere to their physicians' plans of care, and reduce their health risks. The programs use interventions such as: personalized care plans, biometric monitoring devices, 24 hour telephonic nurse access, and group education and support sessions.

Though the first programs have been operational less than six months, the response from beneficiaries, their caregivers and physicians alike has been extremely positive, CMS stated in a press release. “Medicare Health Support is an innovative approach to care that represents a key priority for the future of Medicare,” said CMS Administrator Mark McClellan, MD, PhD.

More information about the program is available online at http://www.cms.hhs.gov/CCIP.

Back to top

Study of PACE Program Shows Home Care Effective

Researchers studied 2,943 frail older people at 13 sites involved in CMS' Program of All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) and found that when elders who qualify for nursing-home care because of their inability to perform daily tasks such as dressing and bathing receive assistance through home care – even for just a few weeks – they are able to stay in their own homes. Elders who lived alone without such needed assistance were more likely to require hospitalization.

The report, in the February 6 issue of the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society was written by Purdue researchers Laura P. Sands, Yun Wang, George P. McCabe and Kristofer Jennings and University of California , San Francisco , investigators Catherine Eng and Kenneth E. Covinsky.

Participants in the PACE program receive care from an interdisciplinary team, consisting of professional and paraprofessional staff that assesses needs, develops care plans, and delivers integrated services. PACE programs provide social and medical services primarily in an adult day health center, supplemented by in-home and referral services in accordance with participant needs.

“What this suggests is that if a homemaker or personal assistant helps these frail elders for a few hours a day, they would be less likely to experience medical conditions such as hunger, dehydration, falls and skin problems that occur when disabled older adults do not receive needed help with daily tasks.” Sands said. “As our government is under increasing pressure to develop fiscally feasible solutions for caring for disabled older people, we feel providing disabled elders with adequate home-based care should receive further attention.”

Sands said that while the concept would not eliminate older people's need for regular medical attention, it could reduce preventable illness, which would improve the quality of life for baby boomer Americans, many of whom will need some form of care within the next decade.

More information on the PACE program is available at: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/PACE/

Back to top

HIMSS Conference: Brailer Plans to Assess RHIOs; Leadership Survey Results

At the 2006 Health Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS) Annual Conference and Exhibition in San Diego , David Brailer, MD, PhD, National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, told reporters that he plans to assess regional health information organizations, or RHIOs.

AHA News Now, a publication of the American Hospital Association, reported that an “ independent contractor would assess the regional organizations this year using secondary research and interviews with state and RHIO officials.” The publication said that the contract is under development and quoted Brailer as saying it would include “tight timelines” and “specific deliverables.”

Leadership Survey

Patient satisfaction, followed closely by Medicare cutbacks and reduction of medical errors, are the issues that will have the most impact on health care in the next two years, said health care information technology executives in the 17th Annual HIMSS Leadership Survey released February 13 th at the HIMSS conference.

Slightly more than half (51%) of survey respondents identified patient satisfaction as a top business issue, compared to 44% in last year's survey. The other top business issues, Medicare cutbacks and reducing medical errors, were cited by 50% and 44% of participants respectively. Other findings include:

  • The most important applications in the next two years: electronic medical record (EMR), 61%; bar-coding prescription medication, 58%; and computerized practitioner order entry (CPOE), 52%.
  • 87% of respondents to the survey said have or plan to purchase an EMR. Of these, 24% have a fully operational system (compared to 18% last year), installation has begun for 36%, another 4% have a signed contract and 24% have developed a plan to implement an EMR. Only 12% said they do not have a plan vs. 17% last year.
  • The technologies most commonly used for EMRs include: high-speed networks, 93%; wireless information systems, 84%; an Intranet, 84%; and computers on wheels, 77%.
  • 14% of respondents said they participate in a RHIO.

The survey, sponsored by ACS Healthcare Solutions, includes responses from more than 200 IT executives who oversee the technology operations at more than 473 hospitals throughout the United States.

More information on the HIMSS conference and the survey is available at: http://www.himssconferencenews.org/index.php?sid=S20060213135945M02K64

Back to top

SureScripts to Give MDs, Patients Access to Medication Histories

SureScripts, the nation's largest network provider of electronic prescribing services, announced at the Health Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS) Conference in San Diego that it will, for the first time, provide physicians and patients with electronic access to medication history while protecting patient privacy. Ninety per cent of all pharmacies in the United States are certified on the SureScripts network.

Physicians in Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Nevada, Tennessee, New Jersey, and Florida will soon receive medication history from community pharmacies when they submit a prescription electronically. Physicians will be provided a single view of a patient's medication history across all prescribers, giving them access to more detailed clinical information on current and past medications. The end result combines pharmacy data with medication data to provide physicians a more complete, timely, and clinically sound view of a patient's medication history.

In addition, SureScripts says it intends to work with physicians and pharmacists to make medication history available to patients. Following a rigorous process guided by HIPAA compliance rules and state privacy laws, and the adoption of strict methods for confidentiality and authentication, consumers will be able to access their medication history from pharmacies in their community through personal health records applications.

Both solutions will create a more efficient, safe, and effective opportunity for patients and physicians to avoid drug interactions and manage complex medication regimens or ongoing maintenance therapies. In addition, SureScripts anticipates that the initiative will spur additional efforts toward making electronic health records and interoperability a reality.

The list of pharmacies participating in the announcement includes, but is not limited to, Ahold (Giant and Stop & Shop), Albertsons (Sav-On and Osco), Brooks Eckerd, CVS, Duane Reed, Kerr Drug, Longs Drugs, Rite Aid, Safeway and Walgreens.

SureScripts was founded in 2001 by the National Association of Chain Drug Stores and the National Community Pharmacists Association.

Back to top

Near Perfect Flu Shot Rate Comes with Price

Virginia Mason Medical Center in Seattle announced in late December 2005 that it “set a new medical center patient safety standard,” by achieving a 96% vaccination rate for hospital staff. Under a controversial mandate in 2005, all 5,000 hospital staff were required to either be vaccinated or face dismissal (medical and religious exemptions were allowed). The national health care worker immunization rate is 36%.

“As the medical center with the highest percentage of older patients in the region, providing the safest possible care is our moral imperative and fundamental to our mission. We know a simple influenza immunization could save a life,” said Patti Crome, Senior Vice President at Virginia Mason.

In addition to the mandate, Virginia Mason provided free staff immunization, education about the immunization, an awareness campaign called “Save lives – immunize,” on-site inoculations and opportunities to request accommodations for special circumstances.

Nursing staff at the hospital objected to the mandatory immunization and the Washington State Nurses Association (WSNA), which represents 600 nurses at Virginia Mason, sued to keep the hospital from firing nurses who do not comply. Preliminary rulings allow the nurses to refuse but Virginia Mason is appealing this decision.

The hospital now requires all nurses who are not immunized to wear masks when interacting with patients. In late January, WSNA filed an unfair labor practice charge against the hospital for this requirement.

Back to top

Call for Nominations:  2006 John M. Eisenberg Award

A call for nominations for the 2006 John M. Eisenberg Award for Patient Safety and Quality Awards has been announced by the National Quality Foundation (NQF) and the Joint Commission on Accreditation and Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO). The submission deadline for nominations is May 1, 2006.

Established in 2002 by NQF and JCAHO in memory of John M. Eisenberg MD, Director of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the awards recognize the achievements of individuals who have made significant and lasting contributions to improving patient safety and health care quality. In addition, the awards recognize individuals and organizations that have made an important contribution to patient safety and health care quality in the areas of research or system innovation through a specific initiative or project.

Award categories include: individual achievement and initiative/project-related achievements: research, innovation at nation or regional level, and innovation at local or organizational level. The accomplishments of nominees should clearly exhibit the following principles:

  • Dedication to improving the quality of health care and patient safety
  • Leadership in advancing methods for measuring and reporting health care quality
  • Expanding the public's capacity to evaluate the quality and safety of health care, and
  • Promoting health care choices based upon information about safety and quality.

The 2006 awards will be presented in conjunction with the NQF Annual Meeting, October 12 and 13, 2006, in Washington , DC .

A nomination form and more information is available at: http://www.qualityforum.org/fmNomination2006.doc

Back to top

Costlier Heart Care May Indicate Inefficient Use of Technology, Study Says

In a Health Affairs web exclusive posted February 7 th , Dartmouth researchers, economists Jonathan Skinner and Douglas Staiger and physician Elliott Fisher find that those regions of the country that spend more on heart attack (AMI) care do not achieve better outcomes than those that spend less. They suggest that the regions spending more are essentially less efficient at using existing tools, regardless of the cost or degree of technology.

Simply cutting spending in high-cost areas may not be the solution, the authors note. They recommend “improving productivity, restructuring hospital resources, improving the efficiency of physician treatment patterns, and accelerating the diffusion of highly effective treatments.” Skinner's team declares: “Efforts to develop measures of quality and efficiency that can encourage hospitals or provider groups to adopt low-cost, highly effective care, while discouraging incremental spending with no apparent benefits, might allow us to keep the golden goose of technological progress alive and well nourished.”

Along with the study, “Is Technological Change In Medicine Always Worth It? The Case Of Acute Myocardial Infarction,” Health Affairs has posted perspectives on the Dartmouth work by Stanford's Alan Garber, MD, and Harvard's David Cutler. The study and perspectives are available at: http://www.healthaffairs.org/

Back to top

Study: Key Elements to Effective Use of Patient Survey Data Identified

In an article in the December 2005 issue of Quality & Safety in Health Care , researchers conclude that patient survey information can be a useful tool in quality improvement efforts if health care providers understand it's potential.

In a Commonwealth Fund–supported study, “Hearing the Patient's Voice? Factors Affecting the Use of Patient Survey Data in Quality Improvement”, authors Elizabeth Davies, PhD, of King's College London School of Medicine, and Paul D. Cleary, PhD, of Harvard Medical School, asked 14 senior health professionals and managers taking part in a quality improvement collaborative to identify difficulties or successes they experienced using patient feedback or survey data.

Davies and Cleary identified multiple barriers to effective use of patient survey data including professional, organizational, data-related barriers ranging from traditional organizational structures to communications issues and difficulty in data interpretation.

Respondents also revealed potential secrets of success: focusing on system changes, rather than assigning individual blame, and developing cultures that support patient-centered care by emphasizing physician leadership, technical expertise, and organizational capacity.

Back to top

Copyright © 2003, American Health Quality Association. All Rights Reserved.