


Quality Update for November 2, 2007
Quality Update for October 5, 2007
Quality Update for September 21, 2007
Quality Update for September 7, 2007
Quality Update for August 24, 2007
Quality Update for July 27, 2007
Quality Update for June 29, 2007
Quality Update for June 1, 2007
Quality Update for May 18, 2007
Quality Update for May 4, 2007
Quality Update for April 20, 2007
Quality Update for April 6, 2007
Quality Update for March 8, 2007
Quality Update for February 22, 2007
Quality Update for February 1, 2007
Quality Update for January 18, 2007
Quality Update for December 14, 2006
Quality Update for November 30, 2006
Quality Update for October 26, 2006
Quality Update for October 12, 2006
Quality Update for September 27, 2006
Quality Update for September 14, 2006
Quality Update for August 31, 2006
Quality Update for August 10, 2006
Quality Update for July 27, 2006
Quality Update for July 13, 2006
Quality Update for June 22, 2006
Quality Update for June 8, 2006
Quality Update for May 25, 2006
Quality Update for May 11, 2006
Quality Update for April 27, 2006
Quality Update for April 13, 2006
Quality Update for March 31, 2006
Quality Update for March 16, 2006
Quality Update for March 2, 2006
Quality Update for February 16, 2006
Quality Update for February 2, 2006
Quality Update for January 19, 2006
Quality Update for January 05, 2006
Quality Update for December 21, 2005
Quality Update for December 1, 2005
Quality Update for November 10, 2005
Quality Update for October 27, 2005, 2005
Quality Update for October 13, 2005
Quality Update for September 29, 2005
Quality Update for September 15, 2005
Quality Update for September 1, 2005
Quality Update for August 18, 2005
Quality Update for August 4, 2005
Quality Update July 21, 2005
Quality Update for July 7, 2005
Quality Update for June 23, 2005
Quality Update for June 9, 2005
Quality Update for May 25, 2005
Quality Update for May 12, 2005
Quality Update for April 28, 2005
Quality Update for April 15, 2005
Quality Update for March 24, 2005
Quality Update For March 10, 2005
Quality Update For February 25, 2005
Quality Update For February 2, 2005
Quality Update for January 20, 2005
Quality Update for January 7, 2005
Quality Update for December 17, 2004
Quality Update for December 3, 2004
Quality Update for November 19, 2004
Quality Update for November 4, 2004
Quality Update for October 22, 2004
Quality Update for October 08, 2004
Quality Update for September 23, 2004
Quality Update for September 10, 2004
Quality Update for August 20, 2004
Quality Update for July 30, 2004
Quality Update for July 1, 2004
Quality Update for June 18, 2004
Quality Update for June 4, 2004
Quality Update for May 21, 2004
Quality Update for May 10, 2004
Quality Update for April 22, 2004
Quality Update for April 9, 2004
Quality Update for March 25, 2004
Quality Update for March 5, 2004
Quality Update for February 20, 2004
Quality Update for February 5, 2004
Quality Update for January 23, 2004
Quality Update for January 9, 2004
Quality Update for December 12, 2003
Quality Update for November 28, 2003
Quality Update for November 14, 2003
Quality Update for October 31, 2003
Quality Update for October 16, 2003
Quality Update for October 3, 2003
Quality Update for September 23, 2003
Quality Update for September 5, 2003
Quality Update for August 22, 2003
Quality Update for August 8, 2003
Quality Update for July 24, 2003
Quality Update for July 11, 2003
Quality Update for June 27, 2003
Quality Update for June 13, 2003
Quality Update for May 30, 2003
Quality Update for May 16, 2003
Quality Update for May 2, 2003
Quality Update for April 17, 2003
Quality Update for April 4, 2003
Quality Update for March 20, 2003
Quality Update for March 7, 2003
Quality Update for February 21, 2003
Quality Update for January 31, 2003
Quality Update for January 17, 2003
Quality Update for January 3, 2003
|
|
|
|
Quality Update for July 30, 2004

Quality Update for July 30, 2004
| Senate
Passes Patient Safety Bill
JCAHO
Releases 2005 Patient Safety Goals
Family
Physicians Eager to Adopt EHR, AAFP Survey Says
HealthGrades
Study Finds 195,000 Medical Error Deaths in U.S., IOM Author Questions
Numbers
AMA
To Seek Comment for New Physician Performance Measures
AHRQ
to Hold Chronic Care Conference Sept. 10-11
AHA
Seeking ‘Quest for Quality’ Applicants by Oct. 15
Senate Passes Patient Safety
Bill
A Senate bill designed to improve patient safety through
collecting and reporting medical error data passed by a voice vote after
a yearlong delay. The bill now must be reconciled with a similar bill
that the House of Representatives passed in March 2003.
“Under this bill, doctors and other health care
providers will be able to report their mistakes without the threat of
punishment, and their patients will be much better off for it,”
said Sen. Jim Jeffords (I-Vt.), the primary sponsor of the bill.
Senate bill 720, the Patient Safety and Quality Improvement
Act, calls for the establishment Patient Safety Organizations (PSO): private
or public organizations tasked with analyzing reported patient safety
data and developing strategic guidance to give back to providers on how
to improve patient safety and the quality of care.
Highlights of the Senate bill include:
-
Creation of a system for voluntary reporting of medical errors to promote
the development of interventions and solutions to ensure that such errors
will not be repeated;
-
Confidential reporting to PSOs: Health care providers would be given
the opportunity to report medical errors, incidents of “near misses”
and enhanced heath care quality practices to PSOs;
- Development
of recommendations, interventions and best practices by PSO’s;
-
PSOs may provide information, in which the patient, provider, and reporter
are not identifiable, to a National Patient Safety Database;
- PSOs
and providers may disseminate information on recommended interventions
and best practices to other PSOs, providers and consumers, to improve
quality of care and enhance patient safety;
-
Establishment of federal evidentiary privilege and confidentiality protections
to promote the reporting of medical errors;
- Granting
a privilege for data and reports being collected and developed by providers
and data and reports sent to PSOs;
- Health
care providers can report and analyze medical errors, without fear of
being sued and without compromising patients’ legal rights. This
non-punitive environment fosters the sharing of medical error information;
-
Current opportunities for discovery are preserved—ensures that
information, such as medical records, exists separately from the patient
safety process would remain discoverable under state or federal law;
-
Promotes development of national standards to integrate health care
technology information systems.
The
Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) unanimously
passed the patient safety bill in July 2003 but disagreements over evidentiary
privileges blocked the bill for almost a year. Sen. Judd Gregg (R-N.H.),
chairman of the HELP committee, said in a statement that bill passed July
22 after bipartisan negotiations.
Back
to top
JCAHO Releases 2005 Patient
Safety Goals
The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
has released its 2005 National Patient Safety Goals for each of its accreditation
programs and its disease-specific care certification program. The goals
and associated requirements, apply to the nearly 16,000 Joint Commission-accredited
and certified health care organizations and programs.
The 2005 National Patient Safety Goals are specific to
the various types of health care settings accredited and certified by
the Joint Commission. These include ambulatory care and surgery centers,
office-based surgery, assisted living facilities, behavioral health care
settings, critical access hospitals, disease-specific care programs, home
health care, hospitals, nursing homes, and laboratories.
“The 2005 National Patient Safety Goals extend our
expectations of accredited organizations in providing safe, high quality
care,” JCAHO President Dennis S. O’Leary, MD, said.
The goals establish succinct, evidence-based requirements
related to critical aspects of care, addressing, for example, the accuracy
of patient identification, effectiveness of communication among caregivers,
safety in the use of infusion pumps, reduction of the risk of health care-associated
infections, reconciliation of medications across the continuum of care,
reduction of the risk of patients falls, and protection against pneumonia
in older adults.
The National Patient Safety Goals are reviewed and revised
annually by the Sentinel Event Advisory Group. The goals are largely,
but not exclusively, based on information from the Joint Commission’s
Sentinel Event Database.
For more info, www.jcaho.org.
Back
to top
Family Physicians Eager to
Adopt EHR, AAFP Survey Says
A member survey conducted by the American Academy of Family
Physicians found that nearly 40% of the respondents have either completely
converted to electronic health record systems or are in the process of
making the transition in their practices.
The survey polled 788 AAFP members in 21 constituent chapters.
Of the 310 respondents that have EHRs, 73% indicated that their EHR systems
improved the health of their patients in part by reducing prescribing
errors and enhancing patient communication. The survey also found that
49% of AAFP members wanted to purchase an EHR—15% of those within
one year, 16% within two years and 18% after two years—with only
7% of the respondents indicating they had no plans to purchase an EHR.
AAFP hopes to have 50% of its active members using EHRs
by the end of next year.
For more info, www.aafp.org.
Back
to top
HealthGrades Study Finds 195,000
Medical Error Deaths in U.S., IOM Author Questions Numbers
An average of 195,000 people in the U.S. died due to potentially
preventable, in-hospital medical errors in each of the years 2000, 2001
and 2002, according to a study of 37 million patient records that was
released by HealthGrades.
The HealthGrades study applied the mortality and economic
impact models developed by Dr. Chunliu Zhan and Dr. Marlene R. Miller
in a research study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association
in October of 2003. The Zhan and Miller study supported the Institute
of Medicine’s (IOM) 1999 report conclusion, which found that medical
errors caused up to 98,000 deaths annually and should be considered a
national epidemic.
The HealthGrades study finds nearly double the number
of deaths from medical errors found by the 1999 IOM report “To Err
is Human,” with an associated cost of more than $6 billion per year.
The IOM study extrapolated national findings based on
data from three states; the Zhan and Miller study looked at 7.5 million
patient records from 28 states over one year; and HealthGrades looked
at three years of Medicare data in all 50 states and D.C. This Medicare
population represented approximately 45% of all hospital admissions (excluding
obstetric patients) in the U.S. from 2000 to 2002.
“The HealthGrades study shows that the IOM report
may have underestimated the number of deaths due to medical errors, and,
moreover, that there is little evidence that patient safety has improved
in the last five years,” said Dr. Samantha Collier, HealthGrades’
vice president of medical affairs. “The equivalent of 390 jumbo
jets full of people are dying each year due to likely preventable, in-hospital
medical errors, making this one of the leading killers in the U.S.”
HealthGrades examined 16 of the 20 patient-safety indicators
defined by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality—from bedsores
to post-operative sepsis—omitting four obstetrics-related incidents
not represented in the Medicare data used in the study. Of these sixteen,
the mortality associated with two, failure to rescue and death in low
risk hospital admissions, accounted for the majority of deaths that were
associated with these patient safety incidents. These two categories of
patients were not evaluated in the IOM or JAMA analyses, accounting for
the variation in the number of annual deaths attributable to medical errors.
However, the magnitude of the problem is evident in all three studies.
But Forbes magazine’s website reported
that Dr. Lucian Leape, adjunct professor of health policy at the Harvard
School of Public Health and one of the authors of the 1999 IOM report,
questioned the numbers. He argued that failure to rescue is not an accepted
standard in calculating deaths in Medical errors, and that the nature
of Medicare patients would increase the mortality rate.
“Medicare patients have a higher adverse event rate
because they have a lot more treatments, they’re sicker, they have
multiple diseases, so the mortality rate, the error rate, all these things
are higher,” Leape said in the Forbes article.
For more info, www.healthgrades.com.
Back
to top
AMA To Seek Comment for New
Physician Performance Measures
The American Medical Association-convened Physician Consortium
for Performance Improvement is beginning a 30-day public comment period
for the recently developed physician clinical performance measures for
community-acquired pneumonia. Both the measures and the comment response
form are available at www.ama-assn.org/go/quality.
The public comment period extends from Aug. 2 –
Sept. 3.
AHRQ to Hold Chronic Care Conference
Sept. 10-11
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality is co-sponsoring
a two-day multidisciplinary research dissemination conference with the
University of Missouri-Columbia Nursing Outreach and Distance Education
program on Sept. 10-11 in Columbia, MO.
The conference, “A National Conference on Transferring
Geriatric Research into Practice: Improving Chronic Care Quality,”
will focus on improving chronic care quality in long-term, home, and community
care settings.
Featured speakers include Rosaly Correa-de-Araujo MD,
PhD, AHRQ senior advisor for women’s health and Arlene Bierman MD,
chair of the Ontario Women’s Health Council Chair at the University
of Toronto’s St. Michael’s Hospital.
For more info, www.muhealth.org/~nursing/node/conference/chroniccare04.html.
Back
to top
AHA Seeking ‘Quest for
Quality’ Applicants by Oct. 15
Applications are now available for the 2005 American Hospital
Association McKesson
Quest for Quality PrizeSM: Honoring Leadership and Innovation in Patient
Care Quality, Safety, and Commitment.
The AHA McKesson Quest for Quality Prize seeks to raise
awareness of the need for an organizational commitment to highly reliable,
exceptional quality, patient-centered care; reward successful efforts
to create and improve systems that improve quality of care; inspire organizations
to broaden their framework for quality improvement efforts through systematic
integration and alignment throughout the organization; and communicate
successful programs and strategies to the hospital field.
The award is supported by grants from McKesson and the
McKesson Foundation.
The award winner will receive $75,000 and two finalists
will receive $12,500 each. Other hospitals may be recognized with Citations
of Merit.
Applications and information on the prize are available
at www.aha.org/questforquality, by calling 312-422-2700, or by writing
the Office of the Secretary, American Hospital Association, One North
Franklin, Chicago, IL 60606.
Applications are due Oct. 15.
Back
to top |
|
|